WikiFrameworksQuebec Law 25Default Privacy Settings

Default Privacy Settings

Updated: 2026-02-23

Plain English Translation

Under Quebec Law 25 privacy by default requirements (Loi 25 article 9.1), organizations that offer technological products or services to the public must configure them to provide the highest level of confidentiality by default. This means users should not have to manually opt-out or adjust settings to protect their personal data; maximum privacy must be the automatic starting state. Notably, Law 25 default privacy settings do not apply to browser cookies, which are governed by other transparency and consent rules.

Executive Takeaway

Organizations must ensure all public-facing technological products and services are configured to the highest privacy settings automatically, without requiring any user intervention.

ImpactHigh
ComplexityMedium

Why This Matters

  • Mitigates the risk of regulatory penalties by adhering strictly to Quebec Law 25 requirements for privacy settings in apps and websites.
  • Builds end-user trust by demonstrating a proactive commitment to privacy-by-default principles.
  • Reduces the likelihood of accidental data over-sharing and subsequent confidentiality incidents.

What “Good” Looks Like

  • New user accounts have the most restrictive data sharing, profiling, and public visibility settings applied upon creation; tools like WatchDog Security's Posture Management can help detect drift from expected default configurations over time.
  • Tracking and profiling features are toggled 'off' by default, requiring explicit opt-in from the user; tools like WatchDog Security's Policy Management can help ensure SDLC and release procedures require this default state and track acknowledgements.
  • Privacy impact assessments (PIAs) explicitly review and validate default configuration states prior to product launches.

Section 9.1 requires organizations offering a technological product or service to the public to ensure that those products provide the highest level of confidentiality by default. This must happen automatically, without any manual intervention from the individual.

In practice, it means that upon initial use or account creation, all optional data sharing, profiling, and public visibility settings must be deactivated or set to their most restrictive state. Users must explicitly opt-in to reduce their privacy protections.

No. The legislation explicitly states that the requirement for the highest level of confidentiality by default does not apply to privacy settings for browser cookies. However, other sections of the law still govern transparency and consent regarding cookie collection.

The rule covers any technological product or service that has privacy settings, collects personal information, and is offered to the public. This broadly includes consumer-facing mobile applications, SaaS platforms, connected IoT devices, and interactive websites.

To meet Quebec Law 25 tracking and profiling opt-in requirements, organizations must ensure that any functions allowing a user to be identified, located, or profiled are turned off by default. Organizations must inform users about these technologies and provide them the active choice to enable them.

CISOs should enforce secure development policies that mandate privacy-by-default, implement automated configuration drift monitoring, and require Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) before releasing new public-facing software features.

To audit default privacy settings for Loi 25 compliance, organizations can maintain version-controlled baseline configurations, utilize automated UI testing to simulate new user onboarding, and document the results in QA reports and change management logs.

Common mistakes include using pre-checked consent boxes, burying privacy controls deep in complex menus, and failing to maintain the highest level of confidentiality when deploying product updates that introduce new data-sharing features.

Both Law 25 privacy by design vs privacy by default and GDPR mandate that the maximum privacy settings be applied automatically. However, a major difference is that Law 25 explicitly exempts browser cookies from this specific default setting rule, whereas GDPR strictly regulates cookie defaults.

Organizations should maintain Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) for all technological products, secure development lifecycle (SDLC) policies, infrastructure-as-code baseline configurations, and detailed change management logs proving default settings are continuously enforced.

Proving “privacy by default” usually requires consistent evidence that default configurations are set to the most restrictive state and stay that way through releases. Tools like WatchDog Security's Compliance Center can help centralize control requirements, map evidence to §9.1, and highlight gaps when required artifacts (e.g., QA results or DPIAs) are missing.

Default privacy settings can degrade over time when new features introduce new toggles or when infrastructure changes alter defaults. Tools like WatchDog Security's Posture Management can help detect misconfigurations and drift against expected baselines, supporting ongoing verification that confidentiality defaults remain in the most restrictive state.

LAW25 § 9.1

"Any person carrying on an enterprise who collects personal information when offering to the public a technological product or service having privacy settings must ensure that those settings provide the highest level of confidentiality by default, without any intervention by the person concerned. The first paragraph does not apply to privacy settings for browser cookies."

VersionDateAuthorDescription
1.0.02026-02-23WatchDog Security GRC TeamInitial publication