Control Documented Information
Plain English Translation
Organizations must ensure that any policies, procedures, and records required to support their AI Management System (AIMS) are accurately created, formally approved, and securely maintained. This ISO 42001 document control procedure prevents the use of outdated rules, ensures important evidence is retained for audits, and protects sensitive AI governance data from unauthorized access or alteration.
Technical Implementation
Use the tabs below to select your organization size.
Required Actions (startup)
- Create a structured shared drive with basic access controls for storing AI policies and procedures.
- Implement a standard document header requiring a title, author, date, and version number.
Required Actions (scaleup)
- Develop a formal document control procedure defining how to create, review, approve, and publish AIMS documentation.
- Track all controlled AIMS documents in a centralized register to manage review cycles.
Required Actions (enterprise)
- Deploy automated GRC or dedicated document management systems to enforce lifecycle workflows.
- Integrate automated retention scheduling and archiving rules for legacy AI records.
- Enforce strict role-based access control (RBAC) and audit logging on all document repositories.
ISO 42001 documentation requirements mandate specific items like the AI policy, risk assessment methodologies, and objectives, as well as any additional documentation the organization determines is necessary for the effective operation of its AI management system.
Documented information refers to any meaningful data that must be controlled and maintained by the organization. This includes policies and procedures that direct activities, as well as records that provide evidence of results achieved.
When creating or updating documents, organizations must include appropriate identification such as titles and dates, use suitable formats, and enforce a formal review and approval process to confirm the document's suitability and adequacy. Tools like WatchDog Security's Policy Management can support this by applying consistent templates, capturing approvals, and maintaining an auditable change history.
An ISO 42001 document control procedure should cover rules for distribution, access, retrieval, storage, preservation of legibility, version control of changes, and the ultimate retention and disposition of records.
While the standard does not explicitly use the term master list, maintaining an ISO 42001 documented information register document list is the industry best practice to identify, track, and manage all required AIMS documentation systematically.
Organizations must establish an ISO 42001 version control and approval process where documents undergo formal review by designated authorities before release. Clear version numbering ensures personnel do not accidentally rely on obsolete information. Tools like WatchDog Security's Policy Management can help by enforcing review cycles, approvals, and acknowledgement tracking against the current published version.
Organizations must implement ISO 42001 access control for controlled documents to adequately protect them from unauthorized alteration, loss of confidentiality, or improper use, ensuring only authorized personnel have access.
The standard requires organizations to define and enforce retention periods. Specific ISO 42001 record retention requirements for AIMS are driven by legal, regulatory, and business needs rather than a universally mandated timeframe in the standard itself.
Yes, documented information can be maintained in any format or media. When stored electronically, controls must include robust data backups, access management, and protection mechanisms to ensure data integrity and continuous availability.
Auditors test how do auditors check ISO 42001 clause 7.5 compliance by sampling documents to ensure they are properly approved, reviewing access controls, and verifying that records are securely archived according to the organization's retention schedule. Tools like WatchDog Security's Compliance Center can help by mapping evidence expectations to Clause 7.5 and maintaining an organized evidence trail for sampling.
Documented information control often fails when teams rely on scattered files, inconsistent approvals, or unclear ownership. Tools like WatchDog Security's Policy Management can centralize policies and procedures, enforce version control and approval workflows, and track acknowledgements so staff consistently use the current, approved AIMS documentation.
Audits commonly require proof that documents are controlled (approval, version history, access, and review cadence) and that records exist for key AIMS activities. Tools like WatchDog Security's Compliance Center can map Clause 7.5 expectations to evidence requests and help organize supporting artifacts (e.g., registers, approvals, and retention evidence) so audits rely less on manual file hunting.
"Documented information required by the AI management system and by this document shall be controlled to ensure: a) it is available and suitable for use, where and when it is needed; b) it is adequately protected (e.g. from loss of confidentiality, improper use or loss of integrity)."
| Version | Date | Author | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2026-02-23 | WatchDog Security GRC Team | Initial publication |