WikiFrameworksEU GDPRProcessing of Criminal Convictions Data

Processing of Criminal Convictions Data

Updated: 2026-02-23

Plain English Translation

Under GDPR Article 10, the processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences is highly restricted. Organizations cannot process criminal offence data unless they do so under the control of official authority, or when specifically authorized by Union or Member State law that provides appropriate safeguards. Furthermore, a comprehensive register of criminal convictions can only be maintained by an official authority.

Executive Takeaway

Processing criminal conviction data requires specialized legal authorization and stringent technical safeguards, as general lawful bases are insufficient.

ImpactHigh
ComplexityHigh

Why This Matters

  • Mitigates extreme regulatory risk, as unlawful processing of criminal data attracts the highest tier of GDPR administrative fines.
  • Ensures the fundamental rights of individuals are protected from severe prejudice, discrimination, or systemic bias.

What “Good” Looks Like

  • Strictly limiting employee background checks to roles where local Member State law explicitly authorizes the collection of criminal records, and capturing the legal justification and approvals in tools like WatchDog Security's Compliance Center for audit-ready traceability.
  • Executing a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) prior to processing any criminal offence data to ensure robust safeguards are implemented, and tracking DPIA status, owners, and evidence in tools like WatchDog Security's Compliance Center to reduce gaps over time.

GDPR Article 10 strictly limits this processing, requiring it to be carried out under the control of official authority or explicitly authorized by Union or Member State law that provides appropriate safeguards for data subjects.

No, if you are asking is criminal offence data special category data under GDPR, it is technically distinct from Article 9 special category data. However, it requires similarly stringent protections and specific legal authorization under Article 10 to process lawfully.

Private organizations figuring out how to process criminal offence data under GDPR must identify a specific authorization in local Member State law or Union law, which usually applies only for strict purposes like specific employment screening or fraud prevention.

Yes, establishing a GDPR criminal records data lawful basis Article 6 and Article 10 authorization are both mandatory. Organizations need a valid Article 6 basis, such as a legal obligation, and a specific Article 10 condition to proceed.

The official authority requirement GDPR Article 10 typically refers to public sector bodies, law enforcement agencies, or courts that have a statutory duty or public task to process or maintain records of criminal convictions.

Employers asking can employers process DBS or background check data under GDPR must consult national employment laws. The legality depends heavily on when is processing criminal convictions data authorized by Member State law, which varies widely across the EU.

Yes, the definition of what is GDPR Article 10 criminal convictions and offences broadly encompasses allegations, pending proceedings, court records, and official certificates verifying the absence of a criminal record.

No, private entities cannot. The GDPR rules for keeping a register of criminal convictions explicitly state that any comprehensive register must be kept only under the control of official authority.

GDPR safeguards for criminal offence data access and retention include strict data minimization, limited retention periods, strong encryption, role-based access control, and mandatory Data Protection Impact Assessments prior to processing.

For those asking how to document compliance for GDPR Article 10 processing, organizations must maintain an updated Record of Processing Activities (RoPA), documented lawful basis assessments, and formal DPIAs detailing the specific Member State laws relied upon. Tools like WatchDog Security's Compliance Center can help link RoPA entries, DPIAs, and supporting evidence to the control so auditors can review a single, consistent source of truth.

GDPR Article 10 often depends on specific Union or Member State authorization, plus documented safeguards. Tools like WatchDog Security's Compliance Center can help teams centralize the control requirements, map processing activities to the relevant GDPR obligations, and track completion of DPIAs and evidence so the organization can demonstrate why and how the processing is permitted.

Because criminal offence data can create severe harm if misused, access should be tightly limited to a small set of approved roles and audited regularly. Tools like WatchDog Security's Secure File Sharing can support this by enforcing encrypted sharing, verification controls, and auditable access logs for sensitive background-check documents and related evidence.

GDPR Art. 10

"Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences or related security measures based on Article 6(1) shall be carried out only under the control of official authority or when the processing is authorised by Union or Member State law providing for appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of data subjects. Any comprehensive register of criminal convictions shall be kept only under the control of official authority."

VersionDateAuthorDescription
1.0.02026-02-23WatchDog Security GRC TeamInitial publication