WikiFrameworksIndia's DPDPCessation of Processing

Cessation of Processing

Updated: 2026-02-08

Plain English Translation

Under Section 6(6) of the Act, when a user withdraws consent, you must execute a complete cessation of processing DPDP mandates. This is not just about deleting a record; you must actively stop data processing for that individual across all your systems and instruct any third-party Data Processors to do the same. This data processing cessation must happen within a reasonable time. The only exception is if retention is strictly required by law; otherwise, all activities relying on that consent must halt immediately.

Executive Takeaway

Withdrawal of consent triggers an immediate legal obligation to stop using the data. Continuing to process data after withdrawal is a violation equivalent to processing without consent, attracting penalties up to INR 250 crore.

ImpactHigh
ComplexityHigh

Why This Matters

  • Continued processing after withdrawal violates the core principle of user autonomy and renders the processing unlawful.
  • Failure to cascade the stop signal to third-party processors exposes the Fiduciary to liability for the Processor's actions.

What “Good” Looks Like

  • Automated workflows that trigger a 'stop processing' signal across all internal databases and external APIs upon consent withdrawal.
  • Clear contractual clauses with Processors mandating immediate cessation upon instruction.

Processing must cease within a reasonable time after the Data Principal withdraws her consent, as mandated by Section 6(6).

The Act specifies cessation must occur within a reasonable time. This implies acting without undue delay to stop the processing activities.

Data can be retained only if processing without consent is required or authorised under the Act or any other law for the time being in force (Section 6(6)).

Section 6(6) explicitly places the obligation on the Data Fiduciary to cause its Data Processors to cease processing the personal data.

While 'reasonable time' is not defined in days in the Act, it generally implies the time technically required to effect the change, without unjustified delay.

Yes, Section 6(6) allows continued processing if it is required or authorised under any other law for the time being in force in India.

Maintain logs of the withdrawal request timestamp and the system logs showing when the processing logic was disabled or the data was suppressed/deleted.

Continued processing after withdrawal is effectively processing without consent. Breach of Section 6 provisions can attract penalties, potentially falling under the general penalty for breach of provisions.

DPDP Section 6(6)

"If a Data Principal withdraws her consent to the processing of personal data under sub-section (5), the Data Fiduciary shall, within a reasonable time, cease and cause its Data Processors to cease processing the personal data of such Data Principal unless such processing without her consent is required or authorised under the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder or any other law for the time being in force in India."

VersionDateAuthorDescription
1.0.02026-02-08WatchDog Security GRC Wiki TeamInitial publication from DPDP Workbook